[squeak-dev] Anyone have any processors in Smalltalk or a formal
semantics?
Igor Stasenko
siguctua at gmail.com
Fri Oct 31 01:21:17 UTC 2008
2008/10/31 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
> I wonder if anyone has any 32-bit processor implementations, either in
> Smalltalk or in some other, preferrably easy-to-parse, formal semantics. In
> implementing the new JIT VM I would like to continue developing in Smalltalk
> using VMMaker/Slang, but this implies having a processor simulation in
> Smalltalk to produce actual machine code for. Ideally this would be an x86
> of some description (doesn't need to be bang up to date, 386 would be fine).
> I'd also welcome an ARM.
> TIA
>
Hi Eliot.
To my knowledge, Exupery is the only project which dealing with assembly code.
There are some mechanisms to define instructions.
>
>
--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|