[squeak-dev] Re: Making a better Compiler for all

Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Mon Sep 1 16:19:59 UTC 2008


On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 18:06:00 +0200, Brent Pinkney wrote:

>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>>
>> > No, you cannot remove Squeak's compiler and use only NewCompiler, if  
>> that
>> > would have been your question.
>
> May I urge that all efforts include Eliot's Cog work. He is making  
> changes to the compiler to support closures and the Cog VM.

Yes, sure. A good compiler supports *any* underlying instruction set and  
architecture (within a predetermined, plan-able framework), even the  
historical ones if someone wants to afford that.

I'm used to that in my shop; I think that everybody is.

>





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list