Sorry, but these are "changes" or "refactors" ?. I mean, do these changes
affect FFI uses, public interface or something? Suppose I am using FFI in a
project, should I care about this ?

many thanks,

mariano

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:

> Just FYI (and in case someone wonders), I spoke to Eliot today and it seems
> indeed to have been a very noisy restaurant ;-) Eliot was referring to his
> "Alien" work which is an FFI replacement (which we have spoken about on some
> occasions) but as far as I am aware the code has not been published
> anywhere.
>
> It certainly was never sent to the VM maintainers.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>
> Andreas Raab wrote:
>
>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> Eliot told me (from memory so can be wrong)
>>>    dan, john, andreas, tim,
>>> but this was in a noisy restaurant (but good)
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure what you're referring to but I'll ask Eliot when he's back.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>  - Andreas
>>
>>
>>  On Aug 30, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 30.08.2008 um 12:26 schrieb stephane ducasse:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> I discussed at ESUG with Eliot and he told us that he sent a while ago
>>>>> his changes to get a much nicer FFI implementation to the VM
>>>>> maintainers.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do not remember seeing this on the vm-dev list:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.google.com/search?q=ffi+eliot+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Flists.squeakfoundation.org%2Fpipermail%2Fvm-dev%2F
>>>>
>>>> Whom did he sent it to exactly?
>>>>
>>>> - Bert -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080917/424c0e1e/attachment.htm