On Wednesday 08 April 2009 10:49:19 pm Juan Vuletich wrote:
> I don't think that SARInstaller is essential. I think it is an optional
> package.
This is true in theory but not workable in practice. Cuis plans to remain slim 
and depends on external packages to grow, it needs to have *a* package 
loader. Supporting SARInstaller may look like extra effort, but the 
alternative is for the image to support *any* package loader. This will open 
a can of worms as users try to track dependencies across packages loaded by 
different loaders.

Please reconsider .. Subbu