[squeak-dev] Re: 3.11 and the trunk

Colin Putney cputney at wiresong.ca
Wed Aug 19 21:25:21 UTC 2009


On 19-Aug-09, at 10:15 AM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:

> For example, I would far prefer to
> see Squeak move to a binary based development model (I would mention
> Projects and Etoys here) than the current source based things we are
> doing (trunk, bob or whatever).

Forgive me for seizing on a throw-away comment like this, but would  
you mind expanding on this a bit? Are you saying you prefer something  
spoonish, where CompiledMethods  are passed directly from image to  
image? Something else?

Colin



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list