[squeak-dev] Trunk commits
Frank Shearar
frank.shearar at angband.za.org
Mon Aug 24 09:37:36 UTC 2009
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 24.08.2009, at 11:24, Frank Shearar wrote:
>
>> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>> On 23.08.2009, at 23:51, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>>>> Hi all.
>>>>
>>>> Would it perhaps be better to have the automated trunk commit
>>>> messages going to some other dedicated mailing list?
>>>>
>>>> Gulik.
>>> I was curious how long it would take the first one to speak up :)
>>
>> Hah, yes indeed :)
>>
>>> No, I would rather create a squeak-users list for those not
>>> interested in developing Squeak itself, but just "with" Squeak. IMHO
>>> the commits messages make the community development process visible,
>>> which is a Good Thing.
>>
>> Well, while they are a bit noisy, I don't mind them, and they _do_
>> provide visibility into the process. I can't say I read all of them,
>> but I like having the option of just skimming diffs if I feel the urge.
>>
>> Other mailing lists do the same: slime-devel have a "Daily Commit Log"
>> message. That might be an option if people find the messages TOO
>> noisy: bundle the commits into a single message per day. Pros: less
>> noise on the list; cons: higher latency for those interested. But, I
>> guess, one could have BOTH: a daily message with all the commits (or a
>> summary, if the message ends up bigger than 100K) to squeak-dev and,
>> er, a squeak-dev-dev for the full fat option.
>
>
> That's precisely what I proposed an hour before ;) Wanna work on it?
This is a fine example of what high latency does :). I saw your earlier
mail, typed up my response, and THEN read the next 10 hours or so of the
list :)
Er, did I just put my neck out? I won't promise anything, but I'll
definitely take a look. (I've two or three deadlines rushing down on me
at the moment.)
frank
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|