On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:28 +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > On Aug 25, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> >
> >> Ken Causey wrote:
> >>> I thought the tests repo was simply an inbox for tests, in fact at  
> >>> one
> >>> point I advocated removing it.  Andreas had some argument against  
> >>> that
> >>> that I agreed with and can't remember just now.
> >>
> >> I don't recall either. And I think that whatever it was it wasn't  
> >> right. It is obviously causing issues already
> >
> 
> 
> I moved all remaining versions from Tests to Inbox, and added a notice  
> to Tests.
> 
> - Bert -

So is there some reason not to just go ahead and delete the Tests
project?  I'm inclined to do so.

Seems to me we are getting to the point where self-documentation is
becoming a necessity.  Perhaps http://www.squeak.org/development/ ?

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090825/e7f19663/attachment.pgp