[squeak-dev] Re: What are MethodDictionary faults?
Mariano Martinez Peck
marianopeck at gmail.com
Wed Dec 23 15:05:10 UTC 2009
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>> That's correct. Small meta note: I don't like playing "20 questions"
>> very much. If you have a theory or want to verify something it's
>> better to post your theory and have people comment on it. Posting
>> one question to get a yes/no, then posting another one to get a
>> yes/no tires me very quickly :-) See also the always appropriate
>> essay from Eric Raymond:
>>
>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html<http://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
>> <http://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
>>
>>
>>
>> Well....You don't HAVE to answer me. This is a public space :)
>>
>
> Sure. And I'll ignore you as a repeat offender in the future :-)
ok...
> But it was a good opportunity to drop in a link to ESR's essay and
> hopefully some people will click on it and ask better questions as a result.
>
>
Yes, it seems a good link. I started to reading it but it is too long so I
keep it so that I can read it when I have more time.
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
> In addition, I didn't have a theory. I just realized that after the
>> following emails. If I would had a theory I would wrote it completely.
>> Anyway, thanks for the help it helped me to understood.
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20091223/22884680/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|