Hi Derek,

they have to be separate. The idea is to control a cursor by sound.
Every direction (left, right, up, down) is supposed to be controlled by a
different sound source.
Currently I am using one microphone and the SpectralAnalyzerMorph. The fft
allows me to split up different frequencies. Consequently, by whisteling at
specific frequencies one can control the cursor in different directions.

What I have in mind however are different sound sources having the same
frequency content. The control of the cursor hence relies on amplitude.

One possibility would be to record four microphones, externally modulate the
frequencies, combine the signals an pull them apart by the fft again.

I was hoping for something more out of the box :). But there apparently is
no simple way to solve that problem

Best
Martin








2009/2/7 Derek O'Connell <doconnel at gmail.com>

> Do they have be separate inputs? If not you could mix them externally.
> If they do have to be separate then a better idea of what you want to
> do would allow alternative suggestions.
>
> On 2/7/09, Martin Bleichner <bleichner.martin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi together,
> >
> > I try to use the input of multiple microphones (four) in a squeak
> > application.
> > I already asked this question on the German list and got the reply that
> it
> > won't work.
> > Does anybody has an idea for a workaround? Squeak might not really be the
> > best language for my project, but as soon as I have the sound signal,
> squeak
> > is perfect for my needs.
> >
> > I also thought about using opencroquet or open cobalt, to record four
> > microphones on four different computers and to integrate the input in a
> > common world.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks a lot
> > Martin
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090207/a3f6ebf5/attachment.htm