[squeak-dev] Board projects (was Re: [Election]
Nomination period ends in 3 days!)
Ken Causey
ken at kencausey.com
Sat Feb 21 21:49:40 UTC 2009
OK, actually the more I wrote the more I began to sense that might be
the case. But that still brings me back to the question: Why would the
project proposers want to do this?
I think this is an easy sell to the consumers, the Squeakers who are the
potential users and beneficiaries of a project. More information
earlier is always a good thing. But how is this sold to the producers,
the ones doing the work? What is the upside for them?
Ken
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 13:34 -0800, Andreas Raab wrote:
> Hi Ken -
>
> Sorry for being unclear. I absolutely agree with your point about people
> doing their projects until they feel it's ready. As a matter of fact I
> think that pretty much all BPPs should be about stuff that's ready to go
> (see my example which already pointed to the code). I do not want empty
> upfront commitments; I want to be able to have the board make decisions
> about concrete work that is there and available to look at.
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090221/41735c1e/attachment.pgp
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|