Nevin Pratt wrote:
> Furthermore, I personally think that having multiple forks for
> multiple purposes is entirely reasonable.  And all of them can be
> supported, and many of them *will* be supported.  I personally think
> that's fine.
>
I do too. As an example of this, I'd like to point out that NetBSD,
FreeBSD, OpenBSD and DragonflyBSD are all quite alive and they're forks
from the same codebase for different purposes, and there is a great deal
of cross-pollination between them.