That'd be OB then.
With the StandardToolSet, Pharo0.1Core-10371, on a 2.8 Quad I get 303 ms...

Regards, Gary

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de>
To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" 
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:40 PM
Subject: [squeak-dev] Re: Usability and look-and-feel (was Re: The future 
ofSqueak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT licenseclean))


> David Corking wrote:
>> I used a 2 GHz Intel processor, and got a delay of around a second
>> every time I opened a new browser window in pharo-dev 0.1.   (I used
>> the OB clones of the standard browsers - not any of the new browsers
>> or undocumented new features.  Also, I don't know if other images
>> perform better.)
>>
>> To satisfy my curiosity, could someone point me to the results of any
>> code profiling done on this issue?
>
> I haven't done any real profiling. But here is a starting point:
>
> [ToolSet default browse: Behavior selector: nil] timeToRun.
>
> On my box this takes 506 msecs in Squeak 3.10, using Pharo it's at 5020 
> msecs. That's 10x slower.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>