On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 22:09 +0200, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> Eliot has found http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7361
> And this implies http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=3374 requires an update
> 
> This change is marked with a testing status.
> What is the policy?
> Is it still time, or does it deserve another report?
> 
> (Note: the fix provided by Eliot at 7361 is for the case 3374 is not
> loaded, so I cannot use the same report number)
> 
> Nicolas

I assume you mean the status of #3374, but it is not testing, it is
pending.  Actually as far as I'm aware pending has no particular meaning
for us and I think Keith set that status before the meanings of the
statuses were set with regard to automatically pulling fixes with
Installer/Bob.  Also, this fix is not marked with a relevant version
number that Installer/Bob would likely be used for anyway.  I see no
reason you can't update the patches for #3374 if you like.  That should
be safe to do all the way up to 'resolved' status.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090710/e5417fa0/attachment.pgp