[squeak-dev] Re: Cross fork development model

Phil (list) pbpublist at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 18:42:51 UTC 2009


On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Ken G. Brown wrote:

> I find that these comments are indeed more towards what Keith has  
> been saying all along.
>
> And I find that Keith's posts have always made positive sense from a  
> point of view of the long term good of the Squeak Community.
> These goals are a big part of what he has in mind.
> He has done a massive amount of work to this end. With help, the  
> processes could be improved and streamlined.
>
> To those that accuse him of not listening, or of having a poor  
> attitude, I say they had better look really, really seriously at  
> their own listening skills and attitudes.
>
> To me, Keith is showing real insight and leadership for the good of  
> the Squeak Community as a whole.
> His ideas and work deserve far better treatment than the community  
> is currently showing.
>
> I am sure there are far more people in the community that can also  
> see this but are not speaking up.
>
> Ken G. Brown

Well put.  No one can change what has already taken place, but it  
would be nice if everyone could take a step back, take a breath, and  
look at how both sets of objectives can be met as they don't appear to  
be (entirely) mutually exclusive and, with a little work, should be  
able to complement each other.

Thanks,
Phil



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list