2009/7/17 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
> He, maybe we need to invent methods to punish developers who break the trunk
> in such a way ;)

Or maybe not. In a continuous integration process, edgar could have
been notified by email that his changes broke the trunk. A carbon copy
can also be sent to the repository admit.

> In any case a process where development slows down when nearing a release
> would be in order, we might need feature freezes etc. Maybe we simply set a
> release date now and then work towards it?

That would make sense. The trunk should be frozen at some point in the
perspective of a release and then enter in a release phase. And the
release phase can be something along 3.11 proposal. My idea of both
development process is that they are not mutually exclusive.

Are we going to have continuous integration on the trunk? Publishing
results on a web page or something would be great.

Ian.

-- 
http://mecenia.blogspot.com/