On 2009-07-23 12:05, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> 2009/7/23 Ian Trudel<ian.trudel at gmail.com>:
>    
>> 2009/7/22 Igor Stasenko<siguctua at gmail.com>:
>>      
>>> Right. Actually everythig , including author initials is built on top
>>> of a good will of one who filling/providing a correct&  trustful
>>> information.
>>> So, i don't see how we could protect ourselves from malicious intents
>>> in this regard.
>>>
>>> If you think in that way, then maybe its not worth it at all.
>>>        
>> That was my point, Igor. Most Open Source projects have the license
>> used on their website and a header with the license in each file.
>> That's it. Plain and simple.
>>
>>      
> unfortunately, we don't have a kind of granularity named 'source
> file', where you can put the 2-3 kb size header with license comment .
> :)
> We have MC, .cs , .st , .pr , .source , .changes , .image (+
> DeltaStreams will appear someday )
> they are all files, but in detail, they could contain a mix of
> properly licensed&  other code.
>    
Shouldn't/ couldn't  License be a object or trait that all object 
inherit from ?
Or a method in Object that you must override to relicense ?

At the method level I'm not sure what to do....


Karl
>
>    
>> Ian.
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://mecenia.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>      
>
>
>
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090723/c52028a0/attachment.htm