[squeak-dev] Re: Smalltalk vs SmalltalkImage current woes
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Fri Jul 24 16:38:07 UTC 2009
Igor Stasenko wrote:
> I am currently using the Cuis, which doesn't having a 'SmalltalkImage
> current' refactoring..
Ah, one of my favorite rant subjects. First, it's not a refactoring;
refactorings leave the public interfaces intact (I really hate it when
people call random rewrites "refactoring" code). Secondly I'm still 100%
behind what I wrote here about Smalltalk vs. "SamlltalkImage current":
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2007-June/118175.html
I'm very glad to hear that Cuis doesn't use SmalltalkImage.
> Now, Smalltalk == SmalltalkImage current and everyone is happy:
> - dictionary lives in separate ivar,
> - fat & boring housekeeping stuff lives in SmalltalkImage instance.
>
> What you think?
I think it's a definitive improvement to the current situation.
Cheers,
- Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|