On Jul 26, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:25:55 +0200, Daniel P Zepeda wrote:
>
>>
>> ... an implementation of Textile, like Ruby's Redcloth?
>
> Have a look at Pier,
>

Yes, this is actually what I was trying to get away from. I like Pier,  
it would suit the needs of some of my users well, but I shudder to  
have to teach them yet another markup language. It was painful enough  
to get them to accept Textile. If there was a Textile implementation  
in Smalltalk, then I was hoping to just add that to Pier. I don't mind  
porting a Textile implementation to Smalltalk, I was just trying to  
avoid duplication of effort.

Thanks!

DZ