[squeak-dev] The future of Squeak & Pharo

Ian Trudel ian.trudel at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 19:35:02 UTC 2009


2009/6/28 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
> Even disregarding what the Pharo people would think about the idea, doesn't
> that argument go both ways? As in "given that Pharo already forked, Etoys
> can now be reintegrated to Squeak"?

As far as I am concerned, I am not and never been interested in Etoys.
I managed to avoid it altogether for the years ever since I begun to
use Squeak. I'd rather prefer not have Etoys merged into Squeak.

Ian.

-- 
http://mecenia.blogspot.com/



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list