2009/6/28 Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall at gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/28 Klaus D. Witzel <klaus.witzel at cobss.com>:
>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:35:45 +0200, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/6/28 Klaus D. Witzel :
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:05:30 +0200, Ian Trudel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I like your ideas, Casimiro. And a lot of boring work, as you would
>>>>> call, but I call it maintenance, has to be done. Internationalization
>>>>> is among the point that prevents me to use Squeak.
>>>>
>>>> Ian, would it be possible you send me a list of what things _you_ need
>>>> for
>>>> internationalization. That would be very interesting in a current
>>>> project.
>>>
>>> Oh, I forgot the usual things. Unicode normalization, collators, date,
>>> number and currency formatting, unicode regexes.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong now: I know you're talking about your framework,
>
> No, not at all. These are more a 21st century programming language
> "features" that just "have to be there".
>
>> can you
>> point me to more specific locations (release/version, class name, method
>> name) or so?
>
> No. AFAIK some of this stuff in on the roadmap for VW 7.7.
>
> http://site.icu-project.org/
> This is what most PHP frameworks use these days and you feel kinda 2nd
> class compared to them if you don't provide it.
>

That is very true. World become smaller and smaller.

>>> Basically what ICU does.
>>
>> Assume that some other project has something new (in a recent .image on a
>> Squeak VM).
>
> Not that I know of.
>
>> How can your stuff be tested with it? Would it be necessary to refactor your
>> app, or can a project man like me do this and that, test this and that (!) ?
>
> There isn't any of the stuff. That's just some of the things that I
> consider missing in Squeak in the l10n area.
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.