Am 29.06.2009 um 01:47 schrieb Klaus D. Witzel:
> [...sorry, it's late...]
Tell me, I am in Vienna. ;-)

>> However, the real answer is: Let's discuss above variants.
> No, since we'd be just running in circles.
Of course, you don't have to discuss that further. Thanks for the  
discussion so far!

> Yes "sachlich", but I don't get your emotional, who was so?
Sorry, I did not want to imply anyone was yet.

> O.K. we have these forks that happened (counting Croquet as well).  
> Accept it, it is the past.
I agree. That's why I proposed c), and not a) and b).

> On the other hand, some here vote for kitchen sink: accept it, but  
> dictate the price. And the price tag is: modularity, everybody can  
> load into a basic .image whatever she/he pleases. Damien and  
> Universe have shown that it works, even if this is always ignored.
I totally agree that modularity is very important. It seems that I  
have not made myself totally clear. But nevermind, it sure is late.

> Nothing else but modularity will work in the long run. I (for  
> example) am not interested in hunting bugs from kitchen sinkers who  
> have long since run away (or are not responsive).
I can understand that. You don't have to of course!

Thanks and Good Night,
Bernhard