Amazing stuff (Was: Re: [squeak-dev] The future of Squeak & Pharo (was Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo MIT license clean))

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 06:57:41 UTC 2009


Stéphane ,
i found some amazing stuff for you in Squeak.

Look for senders of:

#isKindOf:orOf:

and if you not yet fully amazed , then look at senders of

#ownerThatIsA:

Amazing!


2009/6/29 Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/29 Stéphane Rollandin <lecteur at zogotounga.net>:
>>>>> - Not backward compatible
>>>
>>> because, unfortunately, it is a main obstacle for moving forward.
>>> Or maybe not? Maybe we should start making amazing stuff right now?
>>
>> I am doing amazing stuff with Squeak right now. I have been doing so for
>> years.
>>
>
> Then we're putting different meaning in an 'amazing' word.
> I can do amazing stuff, but its often requires hacks, workarounds and
> other different gotchas,
> which i hate to put into my code. And after all of that, fairly, i
> can't call it amazing anymore. Can you?
>
>> Now that Pharo provides the non-backward compatible way, which is fine, I
>> don't understand why the question arises for Squeak once again. Pharo is the
>> solution, isn't it ? (and I mean it).
>>
>
> You may feel content about code, which rots there for years, and
> no-one even cares rewriting/optimizing/making it better.
> But i don't. I don't like sitting on the gas canister and hoping that
> next spark will not blow it up.
>
>> Stef
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list