>> The point is that, to me, this question of backward compatibility is not
>> theoritical. I do have a big amount of code and objects that I will just
>> have to reimplement if backward compatibility is broken. I mean months of
>> work, just to keep in sync with this kind of development. And if I have to
>> do that for each release, well then it would be much easier for me to stay
>> in 3.8 and maintain my own fork.
>>
> 
> So what? Some people keep using even older images.

well thank you for driving me out. I guesss I just have to shut up now.


Stef