On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:

> [snip]
>     As for whether to produce an object memory statically and then set it
> running, or transform an object memory which is always running... I think
> the resulting memory will need to load modules live anyway, so one might as
> well do all the transformations that way. Perhaps this is simply an
> aesthetic choice.


Surely repeatability mandates that one roduce an object memory statically
and then set it running?  Because of things like delays the always running
memory is almost never in a predictable state, so one always ends up with
different bits even if they represent the same functionality.

E.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20090301/a52843da/attachment.htm