Andreas Raab a écrit :
> So perhaps a starting point is to try to replace screaming with getting 
> a better picture about what the opinions on an issue really are. In 
> other words, for potentially controversial issues we (the board) could 
> organize a poll if there is an actionable proposal on the table. The 
> board could then use the result of the poll as a guide to see whether to 
> approve the proposal or not.
> 
> How do people feel about this? Would this be an acceptable way to come 
> to a conclusion? The idea is that someone *will* make a decision (the 
> board) but only if there is a concrete proposal on the table which 
> necessitates the decision, guided by the community opinion. It doesn't 
> mean that all proposals get polled but for the controversial ones I 
> think this could really help both sides understand whether or not the 
> (mostly silent) majority agrees with them or not.


+ 1

Stef