Hi Andreas,

Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
> So perhaps a starting point is to try to replace screaming with getting 
> a better picture about what the opinions on an issue really are. In 
> other words, for potentially controversial issues we (the board) could 
> organize a poll if there is an actionable proposal on the table. The 
> board could then use the result of the poll as a guide to see whether to 
> approve the proposal or not.
> 

Can you explore the scenario where the board goes against the majority 
view? I think in practice it will be quite difficult. If it never 
happens this becomes less an opinion poll, more a defacto binding 
referendum. I'm not saying this is good or bad, I just want to get a 
better idea of how it will work in practice.

Thanks,
Zulq.