On 15.03.2009, at 12:55, K. K. Subramaniam wrote:

> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> For a full integration we probably need to packetize Etoys first, so
>> we can at least compare Monticello packages between Etoys and Squeak.
>> Comments welcome.
> Do you mean package Etoys as a MCZ that can be loaded into Squeak  
> 3.8 or
> Squeak 3.11 (or 4.0)?

No. What I meant was just to reorganize all classes and methods in the  
Squeakland image into categories, based on the initial image  
categorization Andreas originally did for 3.8 (which has been in  
official use since 3.9). That would allow to create MC packages that  
could be compared to the versions in 3.11.

- Bert -