I note if you go to the squeak.org website and tap but report it dumps  
you into Mantis. However for novices that likely isn't helpful
and the link to a mail message from Feb isn't something anyone is  
going to find, or mmm or remember.

On 5-May-09, at 9:05 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:

> I'll check it out. Also note that cc-ing release at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
>  will generally be useful.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
> John M McIntosh wrote:
>> Well then for http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581
>> who would stick that into 3.11? Let alone that I'm looking at  
>> 3.10.2 image
>> Added (partly)
>> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7348
>> On 5-May-09, at 2:07 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>> Hi John -
>>>
>>> John M McIntosh wrote:
>>>> (I had to fix the sq 3.10.2 image because of ignored bug using  
>>>> allInstances I reported years back, never fixed, but fixed in  
>>>> pharo last fall).
>>>
>>> [... snip ...]
>>>
>>>> (to be fair here I could bring some fixes into the 3.10.2 image  
>>>> to reduce the cpu time, but really those fixes should have gone  
>>>> in years ago...)
>>>
>>> Just as an FYI, there is now a well-defined process for  
>>> contributing stuff to 3.11:
>>>
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-February/134095.html
>>>
>>> If these fixes are on Mantis all you need is to provide an  
>>> installer script and update its status accordingly. Just try it!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Andreas

--
= 
= 
= 
========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:   
squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
= 
= 
= 
========================================================================