Looks ok to remove...
Not that there should be any instances of ChronologyConstants around!

Regards, Gary

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Torsten Bergmann" <astares at gmx.de>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 5:04 PM
Subject: [squeak-dev] ivars in ChronologyConstants


> I'm curious why the instance variables "seconds offset jdn nanos"
> are left in the shared pool class "ChronologyConstants".
>
> There is no accessor and the bindings are represented by class
> variables anyway (as the comment in SharedPool states).
>
> It's interesting that these instance variables are the same
> as in DateAndTime class. Pharo looks the same.
>
> When I remove all instance-vars in ChronologyConstants the
> tests will still run - so can we remove them?
>
> Anyone able to enlighten me?
>
> Thx
> T.
>
> -- 
> Neu: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate + 
> Telefonanschluss für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* 
> http://dslspecial.gmx.de/freedsl-surfflat/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
>