Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote:
> I prefer to use PharoCore for deployment and not worry about trimming a
> squeak image when loading several images on production. The squeak
> stable image is to big, and you must update it and then trimming it.

Out of curiosity, what have you been trimming in the past for your 
production deployments?

> PS. to the "against-recommending-pharo" souls, this is not a pharo
> advertisement, just I think that Magma is as stable and solid on Pharo
> as is on Squeak, no matter its short life.

I think it may be helpful to phrase your comments a bit more carefully. 
Keep in mind that the split between Pharo and Squeak has left just as 
many people wounded here as it has in the Pharo world. There is no need 
to rub it in every time you post here. A bit caution is useful since you 
don't know the history and the individuals involved.

Cheers,
   - Andreas