Hi!

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, radoslav hodnicak wrote:

>
> In all my time I've been programming in Smalltalk (since about 2000), the 
> idea that Sets simply do not contain nil was a core assumption of using 
> collection classes for me, not just an implementation detail. I routinely do 
> "something asSet" to get rid of nils, and this change would break all my 
> code.
>
I doubt that. I get an Error when I'm evaluating this: #(1 nil 2) asSet
You should use #(1 nil 2) reject: [ :each | each isNil ] instead.

Cheers,
Levente