On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> 
> On 15.11.2009, at 16:48, David T. Lewis wrote:
> 
> > There is currently a package dependency for VMMaker that requires the
> > entire Speech package (for KlattSynthesizerPlugin). This can be resolved
> > through a minor refactoring of Speech, mainly to move the shared pool
> > class KlattResonatorIndices into a separate package, e.g. "SharedPool-Speech".
> > 
> > Are there any objections to adopting the package name "SharedPool-Speech"
> > for this? By implication, we might also have "SharedPool-FFI" and so forth.
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to have packages named "Speech-Shared" and
> "Speech-Plugin" containing the shared pool and the plugin, respectively?
> That would go along well with the 8 or so other Speech categories.

That would be a good logical organization, but doesn't that require
splitting the existing Speech package into a total of 9 or 10 categories?