On 16-Nov-09, at 5:46 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:

> From a practical perspective, I feel quite comfortable with saying  
> that Seaside support is a priority to the point that it might be  
> driving issues like String/Symbol comparisons, underscores in  
> selectors etc. If Cincom, Dolphin, GST, Gemstone and VA support a  
> particular feature in Seaside in a particular way, I think we should  
> consider it as well.


Another practical compatibility issue is literal syntax for  
ByteArrays. Just about all the other Smalltalks have it, including  
Pharo. I ran into this while trying to update OmniBrowser to the  
latest Refactoring code. Any objections to implementing it?

Colin