On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, K. K. Subramaniam <subbukk at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Friday 20 November 2009 12:16:00 am Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > Anyway, here is how to submit a fix:
> >
> >       http://screencast.com/t/NmM4ODE2ZjM
> >
> > and here how to fix a merge conflict:
> >
> >       http://screencast.com/t/ODRlNGE3N
> Excellent stuff! Any reason why they should not be indexed on
> squeak.org/Documentation?
>
> Visual environments like Squeak need visual docs and video/screencasts
> cannot
> be found easily on the web. Try googling for "squeak submit fix video", for
> instance.
>
> Many steps in Squeak are simple to the point of being incredible. But the
> path
> to simplicity is complex. Documentation/ site could help by indexing
> beginner
> (Developer) videos/screencasts at the top level.
>
> Subbu
>
>

I can not disagree more.  Which do you prefer, this?

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2119529,00.asp

or this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9r1UAVq9AU

Think about which one can embed code examples.  Think about going back and
reviewing steps.  Think about how quick each one is to skim.  Think about
which one is going to be more available, and less dependent on media player
bugs.  Think about how less annoying it is to put up with some retard's
southern rock crap on the intro, and his creepy HAL impression throughout.
 And do I really have to look at him unscrewing screws?   I mean perhaps we
should have a zoom in slo mo in case there are screwdriver tips to be picked
up.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_etZTCxXJy3w/SSoGc8cRfqI/AAAAAAAABqE/9gXPgkZMkMs/s400/Disposable.jpg

'nuff said.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20091120/61cce0a4/attachment.htm