Yes, that's what I meant.

2009/10/14 Colin Putney <cputney at wiresong.ca>:
>
> On 14-Oct-09, at 11:00 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>
>> Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, yes, I hesitated about Matrix >> #shallowCopy, because previous
>>> implementation was just silly...
>>> I again approve the removal of this method, we can afford to break
>>> broken code sometimes...
>>
>> I must be missing something subtle here. How would this code break? I
>> looked at it and I didn't see anything problematic with it.
>
> I think he meant sender of #shallowCopy that assume it's not shallow. "We
> can afford to break broken code."
>
> Colin
>
>