On 15.09.2009, at 11:46, Michael van der Gulik wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> I need an image which has:
> * No traits.
> * Monticello.
> * MIT / Apache 2.0 license.
> * As few bugs as possible.
>
> I need this to grab the code in the Kernel-* and Collections-*  
> categories as a base for namespaced versions. This will be a fork  
> and until I write special tools to manage namespaced changesets, it  
> will be one-way.
>
> What are my options?

VPRI's relicensed Etoys 4.0 image does not have Monticello but  
otherwise fits the bill:
	http://www.vpri.org/vp_wiki

> Is Squeak now under the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses, or are bits in  
> Kernel and Collections still under Squeak-L? Was the relicensing  
> effort successful? The Squeak web site says otherwise.

For practical purposes even Trunk is under Apache/MIT. We just have  
not received explicit relicensing statements from a few contributors.  
The Squeak Oversight Board is in contact with the Software Freedom  
Conservancy about the work remaining to be done to be legally safe.  
This will be called Squeak 4.0, and Matthew and a few others are  
working on this.

> How difficult is it to remove traits from Squeak or Pharo?

Would be great to find out. IMHO Traits should be in the Squeak image  
ready to be used, but not be employed by the Kernel itself. That makes  
them easily unloadable for purposes like yours.

> And the flamebait: which release has the fewest bugs in the Kernel-*  
> and Collections-* categories?


The most recent I would hope, that would be Trunk.

- Bert -