On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:

> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>> 
>>> Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Nothing much to report.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2.8.* loads easily. WAKom startOn: 8080. No problem getting a page.
>>>>> 
>>>>> MetacelloRepository from squeaksource.com. 
>>>>> ConfigurationOfSeaside28-dkh.19.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Test Runner says:
>>>>> 284 run, 282 passes
>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testDictionary
>>>>> WABacktrackingTest>>#testOrderedCollection
>>>> 
>>>> The latter is a Seaside bug. Someone with a google account should open an 
>>>> issue for it. OrderedCollection >> #snapshotCopy is missing (though 
>>>> OrderedCollection >> #restoreFromSnapshot: is there).
>>>> 
>>>> The other was reported earlier as others pointed out and the Seaside 
>>>> developers don't seem to be cooperative in this.
>>> 
>>> I don't think that's entirely fair: they're more than happy to have 
>>> Seaside run on Squeak. They're just not prepared to do our job for us.
>>> 
>>>> So we can:
>>>> - ignore this issue for now and wait till Pharo 1.1 splits Set and 
>>>> Dictionary, then the Seaside developers will fix it by themselves.
>>>> - create our own version of Seaside-Squeak-Core package (as Julian 
>>>> suggested) which'd be the same as Seaside-Pharo-Core + this 2 methods.
>>> 
>>> I vote for this one. Radoslav Hodnicak expressed an interest in 
>>> (co)maintaining a Seaside-Squeak-Core. I suppose I'm tentatively putting 
>>> up my hand here too?
>> 
>> There's no point in splitting if Seaside-Squeak-Core and Seaside-Pharo-Core 
>> will be the same in less than a month IMHO.
>
> I don't follow the Pharo list: do they plan to do what we did with regards to 
> Dictionary and Set? (Could we persuade them to?)

Read this thread: 
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-March/023289.html


Levente

>
> frank
>
>