On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Tobias Pape wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am 2010-04-12 um 18:26 schrieb Levente Uzonyi:
>
>> 		(method getSource asString reject: #isSeparator) includesSubString: 'ifNotNil:[:' ] ].
>
> Given _I_ would have written Code there,
> you wouldn't find any of it with this line,
> as I would have used 'ifNotNil: [:'.
> some other would have used 'ifNotNil:[ :'
> and even other 'ifNotNil: [ :'.

The separators are rejected, so all variations you mentioned will be 
found.

> anyhow, what about bytecode inspection? *duck&hide* ;)

That could work too, but that's probably a lot more complicated.


Levente

>
> So Long,
> 	-Tobias
>
>
>