[squeak-dev] Documentation Team

Hannes Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Tue Apr 20 15:44:52 UTC 2010


OK. That's fine for me.
Hannes

On 4/20/10, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> On 20.04.2010, at 17:25, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> As we now have this nice help menu I think we should make use of it.
>> New versions of the texts there may be easily put as an mcz file into
>> the inbox and show up there for people connected to the trunk. So it
>> will be under version control and considered to be a regular Squeak
>> artifact. This is for the basic documentation including hooks and
>> loading procedures.
>>
>> Additional documentation could be done in the form of some packages on
>> Squeaksource which people may load on demand.
>>
>> A simple reader might be used for displaying the information.  A
>> three-pane browser like
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20100419/0ea15bf9/PastedGraphic-1.png
>>
>> If somebody wants to go for immediate action: What about taking that
>> and using it for displaying the Terse Guide of Squeak? Maybe somebody
>> likes to put this into the inbox?
>>
>> I think documentation _in_ the image is important. The goal of
>> documentation is to save time. If I for myself need several hours to
>> find out a procedure, the next person does not need to have the same
>> struggle. A few lines of text save ofther people a lot of struggle
>>
>> e.g. the installation of Pier2
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-April/148974.html
>>
>>
>> The nice thing people often forget is that any text may be selected
>> and executed. This is something to really make use of.
>> And: documentation should be loadable and unloadable like other modules.
>>
>> I am willing to contribute if meaningful transactions (of
>> contributions) may be done within 30 minutes to 3 hours.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Hannes
>>
>> P.S.1 I think we should revive the documentation mailing list and have
>> the discussion there to reduce the load on this list.
>>
>> P.S. 2
>> Or the beginner's list might be a place as well for this as it is not
>> crowded and there would be "customers".  The term 'beginner' might
>> frighten some people who have been around for a long time. Anyhow if I
>> do not know how something works in a particular area I am a beginner
>> in that area. And the system is actually huge. In which other system
>> are you allowed to tweak the GUI library for example.
>
> IMHO discussion of documentation should happen here on squeak-dev. It
> concerns everyone.
>
> The beginner's list is a place to get advice, not to discuss features or
> strategies.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list