Begin forwarded message:

> From: pharo-project-owner at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Date: April 22, 2010 9:32:08 AM GMT+02:00
> To: stephane.ducasse at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Re: [Question] ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.0 compatible?
> 
> You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
> been automatically rejected.  If you think that your messages are
> being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
> pharo-project-owner at lists.gforge.inria.fr.
> 
> 
> From: stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse at gmail.com>
> Date: April 22, 2010 9:32:02 AM GMT+02:00
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> Cc: Pharo Development <Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Re: [Question] ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.0 compatible?
> 
> 
> Yes we are.
> Even if there was some discussions about the usefulness of toolbuilder spec - I would be in favor.
> 
> Stef
> 
>> On 4/21/2010 4:32 AM, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>>> A question: Art the ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.0 the same?
>>> Or if there is a difference what is the impact of it?
>>> 
>>> Or put the question in another way. If I code an UI using the
>>> ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 will it run in Pharo?
>> 
>> They are mostly the same but not identical. If there is interest in the Pharo community we should merge the versions upstream in http://www.squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder.html (contact me if you're interested).
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> - Andreas
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100422/76b0d1c7/attachment.htm