On 28 April 2010 06:37, Ian Trudel <ian.trudel at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/4/27 Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>:
>> Ian, i am updated FAQ page, with the parts you contributed..
>>
>> Just one thing. Please check if i spell a following correctly:
>>
>> NativeBoost plug-in is currently available on Win32 and Unix (x86)
>> platforms. Implementing other architectures will be straightforward
>> since the plug-in is small and simple.
>
>
> Yes, it seems to be correct. I would like to suggest a correction.
> "will be straightforward" would be better replaced with "is
> straightforward" because it is straightforward right now, right here.
> but leave the text as it is if it is not straightforward at the
> moment. :)
>
>> Nativeboost requires a platform with a VM able to control memory
>> regions and render them executable.
>
> Apparently my mistake.. NativeBoost
>
> It's important to write your project name the same manner throughout your texts.
>
>> (for those who missed the pun, NativeBoost is now available for Linux 32 bit).
>
> Congratulation! A new baby is born. he he he
>

yeah.. it costed me some brain cells (and even to my wife, hearing me
swearing :).

The C world is full of crap.. that's why i trying to make all my
living in smalltalk and do not step into
'full-o-crap' territory, unless its neccessary.

And NativeBoost will allow me to not write squeak plugins in C
anymore, because i can implement them in image.


>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>>
>
> Best regards,
> Ian.
> --
> http://mecenia.blogspot.com/
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.