I tried to attach the package (mcz file) to the thread but it got
rejected by moderator saying that the message was bigger than 100K.

I changed the cookie delimiter from ',' to ';'. Also I "relaxed" the
rule that a domain in the cookie should have a '.' at the beginning
(in many cases it doesn't have it so some libraries "normalize" it by
putting the period in front of the domain).
Also I created the SocketStreamDebug which allowed me to see all the
requests and responses in the Transcript window, maybe there is a
better way, I am very new to Smalltalk.
What's the other way for me to send the changes?

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andrei Stebakov <lispercat at gmail.com> wrote:
> The package is attached.
> I changed the cookie delimiter from ',' to ';'. Also I "relaxed" the
> rule that a domain in the cookie should have a '.' at the beginning
> (in many cases it doesn't have it so some libraries "normalize" it by
> putting the period in front of the domain).
> Also I created the SocketStreamDebug which allowed me to see all the
> requests and responses in the Transcript window, maybe there is a
> better way, I am very new to Smalltalk.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 8/9/2010 9:18 PM, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
>>>
>>> What's the process of code review for Sqeak/Pharo?
>>> I just tried to post my changes for WebClient Monticello repository
>>> via "Save" and it got rejected with error "401". Looks like I don't
>>> have write access to it.
>>
>> That's right. I'm the sole author of WebClient for the time being. If you
>> have patches or improvements that you'd like to contribute, please send them
>> to me.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>  - Andreas
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Andrei
>>> Stebakov<lispercat-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that's correct for Set-cookie (the response), each has its own line.
>>>> "Cookies: " for request should be all in one line.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Philippe
>>>> Marschall<kustos-hi6Y0CQ0nG0 at public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04.08.2010 19:15, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/4/2010 9:57 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Adrei, excellent :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, for HTTP Client you should cc Andreas Raab   or squeak mailing
>>>>>>> list....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Squeak-dev please
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-dev).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Andrei
>>>>>>> Stebakov<lispercat-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:lispercat-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     I also found that cookies were not correctly sent.
>>>>>>>     Every cookie was sent with its own "Cookie: " header which is not
>>>>>>>     correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm curious, why do you think that's incorrect? My understanding is
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> RFC 2616 explicitly allows that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     "Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be
>>>>>> present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that
>>>>>> header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]. It
>>>>>> MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one
>>>>>> 'field-name: field-value' pair, without changing the semantics of the
>>>>>> message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each
>>>>>> separated by a comma."
>>>>>
>>>>> You're correct, but that doesn't mean the implementations follow the
>>>>> spec :-(. I can only speak for Set-Cookie, there you have to send each
>>>>> cookie on a new line because the expires date format includes a comma
>>>>> and Firefox and IE can't handle that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> Pharo-project-bM+ny+RY8h+a+bCvCPl5/gCzwTLBPCX0 at public.gmane.org
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>