On 8/11/2010 7:47 AM, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
> I tried to attach the package (mcz file) to the thread but it got
> rejected by moderator saying that the message was bigger than 100K.
>
> I changed the cookie delimiter from ',' to ';'. Also I "relaxed" the
> rule that a domain in the cookie should have a '.' at the beginning
> (in many cases it doesn't have it so some libraries "normalize" it by
> putting the period in front of the domain).
> Also I created the SocketStreamDebug which allowed me to see all the
> requests and responses in the Transcript window, maybe there is a
> better way, I am very new to Smalltalk.
> What's the other way for me to send the changes?

You could send them directly to me but since the changes are kind of 
simple, I'm more interested in the "why" of these changes. In particular 
the change to the cookie delimiter seems rather arbitrary to me. Can you 
elaborate why that change should be made?

Cheers,
   - Andreas

> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andrei Stebakov<lispercat at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> The package is attached.
>> I changed the cookie delimiter from ',' to ';'. Also I "relaxed" the
>> rule that a domain in the cookie should have a '.' at the beginning
>> (in many cases it doesn't have it so some libraries "normalize" it by
>> putting the period in front of the domain).
>> Also I created the SocketStreamDebug which allowed me to see all the
>> requests and responses in the Transcript window, maybe there is a
>> better way, I am very new to Smalltalk.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Andreas Raab<andreas.raab at gmx.de>  wrote:
>>> On 8/9/2010 9:18 PM, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What's the process of code review for Sqeak/Pharo?
>>>> I just tried to post my changes for WebClient Monticello repository
>>>> via "Save" and it got rejected with error "401". Looks like I don't
>>>> have write access to it.
>>>
>>> That's right. I'm the sole author of WebClient for the time being. If you
>>> have patches or improvements that you'd like to contribute, please send them
>>> to me.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   - Andreas
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Andrei
>>>> Stebakov<lispercat-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that's correct for Set-cookie (the response), each has its own line.
>>>>> "Cookies: " for request should be all in one line.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Philippe
>>>>> Marschall<kustos-hi6Y0CQ0nG0 at public.gmane.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04.08.2010 19:15, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/4/2010 9:57 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Adrei, excellent :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, for HTTP Client you should cc Andreas Raab   or squeak mailing
>>>>>>>> list....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Squeak-dev please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-dev).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Andrei
>>>>>>>> Stebakov<lispercat-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:lispercat-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>>    wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      I also found that cookies were not correctly sent.
>>>>>>>>      Every cookie was sent with its own "Cookie: " header which is not
>>>>>>>>      correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm curious, why do you think that's incorrect? My understanding is
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> RFC 2616 explicitly allows that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      "Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be
>>>>>>> present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that
>>>>>>> header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]. It
>>>>>>> MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one
>>>>>>> 'field-name: field-value' pair, without changing the semantics of the
>>>>>>> message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each
>>>>>>> separated by a comma."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're correct, but that doesn't mean the implementations follow the
>>>>>> spec :-(. I can only speak for Set-Cookie, there you have to send each
>>>>>> cookie on a new line because the expires date format includes a comma
>>>>>> and Firefox and IE can't handle that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> Pharo-project-bM+ny+RY8h+a+bCvCPl5/gCzwTLBPCX0 at public.gmane.org
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>