In the sense of step towards a smaller image.

On the 20th May Igor Stasenko started a thread
<citation>
        Towards clean unloading Morphic (an idea)

i just thought, that in order to get down to a minimal kernel image,
it would be nice to move all Morphic globals into a shared pool.

Things like, World, ActiveWorld
could be placed into a MorphicPool class.
</citation>
...

Eliot Miranda considered the idea to be good.


In addition I think it would be good to split the Morphic package.

It is quite big and it is often changed. The version number is
currently over 400. This is high compared to over packages.


But I assume Andreas and Juan have some more precise ideas how they
want to proceed.

--Hannes

On 8/21/10, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/20/10 7:50 PM, "Juan Vuletich" <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:
>
>> So, you think that this Pharo Kernel would be better than Cuis as the
>> Squeak kernel? Why? Is anybody with a deep knowledge of Pharo Kernel
>> willing to help base Squeak on it?
>>
>> Are you asking why I do Cuis? Isn't
>> http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html clear enough?
>>
>> Please, do answer these questions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Juan Vuletich
>
> First, don't take personal.
>
> Cuis is a very valuable fork, but until now I don't see how you go from Cuis
> to  any trunk complex image.
>
> Maybe is again my lack of skill...
>
> This also is true for the Pharo kernel.
>
> But in my (maybe wrong) view, the kernel is simpler.
> No
>
> What community needs is HOW TO go from it to complex images in a documented
> way.
>
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>
>
>