Dear all

What I have understood so far:

You are talking about learning from the experience of Juan (and
hopefully Pavel as he seems to be back and willing to donate time) to
reapply those changes to the regular Squeak 4.1 trunk.

Is this correct?

--Hannes

On 8/22/10, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Casey Ransberger
> <casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
>> To be clear: I am not arguing against rebasing the trunk on Cuis. I'm just
>> not clear on what we gain by doing so, rather than by continuing to make
>> packages unloadable, and by settling on a mechanism to reload them on
>> demand, while keeping reasonable safeguards in place to make sure they'll
>> work with a particular release.
>
> Morphic 3?
>
>> My biggest concern is: has Cuis seen the same scrutiny that went into
>> Squeak 4.0 with regard to licensing concerns? Have we run this idea past
>> the SFC?
>
> Ah, good point.  I hope Juan will comment about this.
>
>  - Chris
>
>