[squeak-dev] Choice of image for OMeta?

Hannes Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 06:05:46 UTC 2010


According to
http://tinlizzie.org/ometa/
it works in both 3.8 and 3.9.

I think both are fine and I am interested in reading about your
experience of loading it into Squeak 4.1trunk.

--Hannes

More about OMeta
http://www.tinlizzie.org/~awarth/
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/ometa

Do you have other links?


On 8/25/10, Casey Ransberger <casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the choice of 3.8, or 3.9, do folks have a general suggestion? I've
> heard there were some "sweet" images over the years. I'm of course going to
> be unable to resist loading OMeta into a trunk image; I have low
> expectations for success with that, but I'm kind of interested in seeing
> what the difference is in the performance of the Javascript implementation
> when Cog is at the bottom of the stack. So I was thinking that I'd get it
> loaded into an older image, and try to get to know it there.
>
> --
> Casey Ransberger
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list