Thank you Edgar for your explanations.

In my understanding there is work going on in three different 'product
lines', so to say


1) The regular trunk image as is (for a bit less than a year I think)

2) A minimal image (Pavel, Andreas, Juan, you with SqueakLight)

3) FunSqueak - (loaded on top of 1). It acts as a showcase for
projects, people can have a look at things without going through the
pain of hunting for packages, load scripts etc.)


I understand that for 3) you use different methods, not only
Monticello, but as well SAR files (Squeak Archive), Change Sets (cs)
and direct manipulation within the image.


Hannes

On 8/31/10, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/31/10 9:31 AM, "Hannes Hirzel" <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for this informal report. An answer to just one point before
>> I go to lunch.
>> I just did run a reduced image with a MSWindows Cog VM, see
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-August/153026.html
>
> As "reduced image" your have SqueakLight3 which do not load again downloaded
> packages and can load MultiMediaMonticello (old ProcustesEnd).
> You could forget some other differences by now.
> Maybe I should put again a older one into Experiments and you see the
> updated steps.
> I wish have not only Monticello , but also .cs via Utilities
> applyUpdatesFromDisk.
> Here you could test image with your own different code and send later to
> some place...
>
>
> The real challenge is not build a big image (Etoys, Croquet, Seaside) or
> Fun, MuO, BabyIDe starting from rgular trunk.
>
> It's if we could do using smaller/modular like Pavel, Juan, mines , others
> (SqueakCore PharoCore iPhone.image of John is a nicer one for start)
>
> We should have the goal of unload one or more packages of 4.2...
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>