AW: Re: [squeak-dev] 4.2 code freeze

Germán Arduino garduino at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 00:00:26 UTC 2010


2010/12/5 Alexander Lazarević <laza at blobworks.com>:
> Integration of OCompletion would not need to be done as a fork. It could
> mean to have it preloaded in a trunk image and maintain that future versions
> still work.
>
> I don't think that having something like OCompletion per default in trunk
> will be like having "all bells and whistles". It's something basic like ...
> well ... shout, which we have forked into trunk.
>
> In general I don't think trunk means to keep it archaic and to blister
> yourself in using it.
>

FULL full agree.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list