[squeak-dev] Gofer versus Installer
Janko Mivšek
janko.mivsek at eranova.si
Wed Dec 15 14:27:45 UTC 2010
Hi guys,
Cross posted to Squeak and Pharo.
On 14. 12. 2010 22:56, Ken G. Brown wrote:
>> Lukas maintains Gofer
>> and there are reasons to use it: closer relationship with Pharo, contemporary MC integration (Metacello).
>
> I can accept using Gofer in trunk, for things that require it like reading it's own scripts.
> But I don't want to see Installer go away... because of all the things Installer does that Gofer doesn't.
What if someone:
1. adds to Gofer loading from SqueakMap and other
2. then Lukas is kindly asked to rename it to the Installer.
That way we will have a maintained installer with a meaningful name and
everyone will be happy. Because we really need one and only one
installer for both Squeak and Pharo.
Best regards
Janko
--
Janko Mivšek
AIDA/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|