What about these?  I had trouble finding mention of any specific
license, other than "Free".

    http://findicons.com/

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Casey Ransberger
<casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not that I've found. It seems most stuff is CC or GNU, and I know for certain that the latter won't work for us. I've considered hiring someone to do some new ones and put them under MIT. Sadly and ironically, art is a hard job to find a volunteer for.
>
> On Dec 17, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to distract from your question about CC licensing, which
>> I think is a good question, but perhaps there are some truly free
>> icons out there we can pick from, just quickly to get some "new paint"
>> into the place?
>>
>> I'm definitely interested in seeing Squeak refreshing its icon-set,
>> but less interested in wrangling about licensing semantics.  I'm sure
>> we can forward your question to the SFC and hope for a clear-cut
>> answer.  In the meantime, are there are _free_ icons worth
>> considering?
>>
>> - Chris
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Casey Ransberger
>> <casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Did we ever get around to touching base with SFC about using CC artwork (I'm thinking icons) in Squeak?
>>>
>>> I'd really like to understand the chemical interactions between the CC and MIT licenses, but I don't have extra scratch to pay an IP lawyer.
>>>
>>> I'd like to think about incorporating some of the CC icons that were recently released by HPI.
>>>
>>> Can we leverage SFC to discover this information?
>>>
>>
>
>